In March of 1918 a story appeared in the pages of Detective Story Magazine and the author of the story was Seabury Quinn. The title of the story was “Demons of the Night”.
As near as we can tell, “Demons of the Night” was Quinn’s first fiction sale. That sale began a fiction writing career that spanned over half a century, and saw the production of over 500 short stories and 2 novels. And those numbers don’t include his many non-fiction writings.
Seabury Quinn was the quintessential pulp fiction master, along with such greats as H. Bedford-Jones, Erle Stanley Gardner, and Robert E Howard. He knew how to craft a story that would sell and he wasn’t shy about going where the money was to be found.
In his day, Quinn was an exceedingly popular author. A Weird Tales poll of the magazine’s readers put Quinn as their number one favorite author — ahead of such luminaries as HP Lovecraft, Robert E Howard, and August Derleth. More Seabury Quinn stories received cover art than any other writer for Weird Tales. As I noted in another post, it was Quinn and his creation, Jules de Grandin, who saved Weird Tales from folding in the early ‘30s, which would have possibly denied us the best of Lovecraft’s work, and such talents as Robert Bloch.
So why is Seabury Quinn denied his claim to fame and basically relegated to a footnote? The answer lies with the politics of the Lovecraft Circle, specifically the machinations of August Derleth.
In order to elevate Lovecraft, Seabury Quinn became the whipping boy. Quinn was a hack and the epitome of what was bad in pulp magazine fiction. Lovecraft, on the other hand, was a genius and represented the highest ideals and possibilities of the pulp magazines. Derleth’s hero worship put the knife in Quinn’s back. And why Quinn, and not someone else? Probably because Lovecraft didn’t like Quinn’s fiction, making him an easy target.
For a long time I held to the common, albeit unfair, assessment that Quinn was a hack. I held that view until I actually read some of his stories. Much to my surprise, his stories are no worse than Lovecraft’s, or Howard’s, or Frank Belknap Long’s, to name three, and in some cases better.
Seabury Quinn was a decent, prolific, and inventive writer, much like Robert E Howard. Quinn was paid more than the other writers for Weird Tales because the magazine’s readers wanted his stories.
Now, thanks in large part to ebooks, publishers are republishing the work of Seabury Quinn, and I am very pleased to see him regaining the recognition he is due.
Yesterday, for Christmas, I received two volumes of Quinn’s work: Demons of the Night and Other Early Tales, edited by Gene Christie and published by Black Dog Books; and A Rival from the Grave, The Complete Tales of Jules de Grandin, Volume 4, edited by George A Vanderburgh and published by Nightshade Books. Santa was indeed good!
In short order, Seabury Quinn has become one of my favorite authors. His books stand right next to the works of Lovecraft and Howard. He’s easily their equal. Sure, he’s different from them. But that doesn’t make him a lesser writer. Seabury Quinn’s stories have immense entertainment value. What more can one ask from a writer?
As always, comments are welcome; and, until next time, happy reading!
Share This!
It was by a lucky chance that I had the possibility to read many of the Weird Tales authors. In the early 1990s, a publisher here in Italy launched a series of books that were absolutely inexpensive (they would cost 0,50 euro today) and he could do that because he used very cheap material and printing processes (much as the real Weird Tales) and most of those authors’ work was publisc domain.
Many were Weird Tales authors and I read them with great pleasure. I’ve always liked the Weird Tales style.
Let’s fece it, the great majority of Weird Tales authors weren’t all that good. But there were many good craftmen and craftwomen, who could skillfully tell their stories. True masters were very few, but so what? Good stories are good stories even if they are not masterpieces. Why shouldn’t we enjoy them?
I remember reading Seabury Quinn, even if I don’t remember what I read by him (it was a long time ago). I remember his name as one among my favourite 🙂
I agree: good stories are good stories. Not everything is a masterpiece, but that doesn’t mean it won’t bring a few moments of pleasure. I take comfort in that thought regarding my own work. 😉
Thanks for this, Christopher. I read some of Seabury Quinn’s stories many moons ago. Time for a reread, perhaps. Anyway, Season’s Greetings and Happy New Year and many happy returns!
You’re welcome, John! IMO, Quinn’s reputation got the bum’s rush. He’s a very decent writer. And Season’s Greetings to you and yours and many your new year be filled with peace and joy!!